- Bitter reversal: Myanmar military coup wipes out press freedom gains
- Murders of journalists more than double worldwide
- Record number of journalists jailed worldwide
- Getting Away with Murder
- Covering police violence protests in the US
- Amid COVID-19, the prognosis for press freedom is dim. Here are 10 symptoms to track
- The Trump Administration and the Media
- About: The Trump Administration and the Media
- Trust deficit: About This Report
Reporter Without Borders
- UK: Blogger Craig Murray jailed for eight months over “jigsaw identification”
- How dare China, the worlds’ number one propagandist, accuse the BBC of broadcasting “fake news"?
- RSF hails former Malian intelligence chief’s arrest over reporter’s disappearance
- Landmark public inquiry report finds Maltese state must “shoulder responsibility” for the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia
- Ugly Twins: a novel type of attacks on local independent media in Serbia
- RSF launches a resource platform on journalism safety
- Reporters attacked while covering Covid pass protests in four EU countries
- RSF calls for the release of a Sudanese journalist jailed in Saudi Arabia
Proposed Legislation Bodes Ill for South Africa Press
H.E. Jacob Zuma
Office of the President
Private Bag X83/ X1000
Union Buildings, Government Avenue
Republic of South Africa
Fax: (011.27.12) 323.8246
We write to add our voice to the chorus of concern regarding legislation now before the South African parliament proposing restrictions on press freedom unprecedented in the new South Africa.
As you know, the proposed Protection of Information Bill would replace laws in force since 1982. The source of our concern is language proposed by Security Minister Siyabonga Cwel — language so broad that it would criminalize the legitimate work of investigative journalists and, in so doing, hide government officials from accountability to the nation.
Under the proposed bill, officials would be given wide authority to declare virtually any public or commercial data secret or, in some other sense, “protected” according to a definition of “national interest” suitable to the moment. And they could do so without the requirement of explanation to anyone.
Furthermore, the language places a vague but consequential responsibility for “public interest” on journalists. A journalist found guilty of breeching the “public interest” could face up to 25 years in jail.
Debate on the new legislation is happening simultaneously with a proposal from your party, the African National Congress, to establish a Media Appeals Tribunal that would issue unspecified sanctions for complaints against the press. As our colleagues at the Committee to Protect Journalists have pointed out, exactly this kind of regulatory agency has been used across Africa as a cover for political censorship, with terrible effects for democracy in those countries.
Since the end of the apartheid era 20 years ago, South Africa has distinguished itself by the growth of an assertive and professional independent press. But the proposals now before the nation bode ill for our South African colleagues. We urge you, as chief executive and head of the ANC, to make clear your opposition to any idea that would check the right of professional reporters to do their jobs and hold public officials accountable for their actions.
Co-chairs, Freedom of the Press Committee
H.E. Ebrahim Rasool
Ambassador of South Africa to the U.S.A.
Embassy of the Republic of South Africa
3051 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington , DC 20008
Fax: (202) 265.1607
Ambassador Baso Sangqu
Permanent Mission of the Republic of South Africa
to the United Nations
333 East 38th Street
New York , NY 10016
Fax: (212) 692.2498
H.E. Donald Gips
U.S. Ambassador to South Africa
Embassy of the United States of America
877 Pretorius Street
Fax: (011. 27.12) 342.2299
South African Press Association
Cotswold House, Greenacres Office Park
Fax: (011.27.11) 782.1587/ 88