- Police raid Cairo offices of Turkish Anadolu News Agency, arrest at least 4
- Ugandan police harass and detain journalists covering opposition politician Bobi Wine
- Journalist Patricia Kayuni assaulted while covering protest in Malawi
- Missing radio anchor found dead in Mexico’s Michoacán state
- Sudan suspends four news outlets over alleged financial link to Bashir regime
- Colombian magazine Semana alleges military spied on its journalists
- Montenegro reporters Živković and Raičević charged with criminal incitement
- Malawi detains, charges 3 journalists seeking to cover EU delegation’s return
- Journalists threatened, assaulted while covering local politician in Sierra Leone
Reporter Without Borders
- RSF calls for US government to directly engage Syria on Austin Tice
- Ukraine: RSF warns against ineffective and counterproductive draft bill on disinformation
- Press freedom violations recounted in real time January 2020
- Congolese community radio station torched for covering Ebola
- Sri Lankan police refuse protection to journalists threatened with death
- Three journalist arrested, two radio stations closed in Gambia
- Saudi Arabia – How much longer will the world tolerate MBS’s bad behavior?
- Weekly seized from Gabon’s newsstands
Proposed Legislation Bodes Ill for South Africa Press
H.E. Jacob Zuma
Office of the President
Private Bag X83/ X1000
Union Buildings, Government Avenue
Republic of South Africa
Fax: (011.27.12) 323.8246
We write to add our voice to the chorus of concern regarding legislation now before the South African parliament proposing restrictions on press freedom unprecedented in the new South Africa.
As you know, the proposed Protection of Information Bill would replace laws in force since 1982. The source of our concern is language proposed by Security Minister Siyabonga Cwel — language so broad that it would criminalize the legitimate work of investigative journalists and, in so doing, hide government officials from accountability to the nation.
Under the proposed bill, officials would be given wide authority to declare virtually any public or commercial data secret or, in some other sense, “protected” according to a definition of “national interest” suitable to the moment. And they could do so without the requirement of explanation to anyone.
Furthermore, the language places a vague but consequential responsibility for “public interest” on journalists. A journalist found guilty of breeching the “public interest” could face up to 25 years in jail.
Debate on the new legislation is happening simultaneously with a proposal from your party, the African National Congress, to establish a Media Appeals Tribunal that would issue unspecified sanctions for complaints against the press. As our colleagues at the Committee to Protect Journalists have pointed out, exactly this kind of regulatory agency has been used across Africa as a cover for political censorship, with terrible effects for democracy in those countries.
Since the end of the apartheid era 20 years ago, South Africa has distinguished itself by the growth of an assertive and professional independent press. But the proposals now before the nation bode ill for our South African colleagues. We urge you, as chief executive and head of the ANC, to make clear your opposition to any idea that would check the right of professional reporters to do their jobs and hold public officials accountable for their actions.
Co-chairs, Freedom of the Press Committee
H.E. Ebrahim Rasool
Ambassador of South Africa to the U.S.A.
Embassy of the Republic of South Africa
3051 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington , DC 20008
Fax: (202) 265.1607
Ambassador Baso Sangqu
Permanent Mission of the Republic of South Africa
to the United Nations
333 East 38th Street
New York , NY 10016
Fax: (212) 692.2498
H.E. Donald Gips
U.S. Ambassador to South Africa
Embassy of the United States of America
877 Pretorius Street
Fax: (011. 27.12) 342.2299
South African Press Association
Cotswold House, Greenacres Office Park
Fax: (011.27.11) 782.1587/ 88